- Unit 25, 42 Bundall Road, Bundall QLD 4217
- | Mon to Fri 8:30am to 5:00pm
- hello@elev8ba.com.au
- 0425 609 720
The 2026–27 Federal Budget has reshaped the conversation around property investment and tax planning.
With proposed changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax, the structure used to hold property is now more important than ever — including Self-Managed Super Funds (SMSFs).
This is not a recommendation to invest through SMSFs, but a structural comparison following recent policy changes.
From 1 July 2027, proposed reforms will:
Existing investments may generally be grandfathered, while new purchases could fall under the new rules.
SMSFs are taxed differently from individuals, which changes the comparison:
However, this does not automatically make SMSF property better — it simply changes the structure comparison.
SMSF property investing is not suitable for everyone.
It requires:
It is a regulated legal structure, not just a tax strategy.
If borrowing is used, it is typically through a Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA).
Key point: The lender’s claim is limited to the property, not the entire SMSF.
| Feature | Personal Ownership | SMSF Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| Tax rate | Up to 47% | 15% |
| CGT outcome | Higher tax | Lower effective |
| Negative gearing | Restricted | Not affected |
The key question is not just tax — but long-term outcome:
The 2026 Budget highlights one clear message:
Structure matters — but strategy matters more.
SMSF property investment is a long-term decision that must be carefully assessed with professional guidance.